Regulatory Intelligence

Every jurisdiction. Every regulation. Real-time.

Multi-jurisdiction regulatory mapping with risk signals anchored to enforcement precedent, not opinion.

Active Frameworks

Active regulatory coverage

EU

ECGT Directive

Restricts generic environmental claims without recognised excellent environmental performance and bans product climate-neutrality claims based on offsetting. Applies from 27 September 2026.

14 claims affected

US FTC

FTC Green Guides + State Coverage

FTC Green Guides remain the main federal reference point, while states add their own environmental-marketing and recyclability rules. Coverage tracks federal guidance, state statutes, and notable attorney general actions.

UK CMA

Green Claims Code

Six-principle CMA guidance for environmental claims under UK consumer law. Applies across marketing channels, with ongoing CMA investigations and stronger DMCC Act enforcement powers.

8 claims affected

DACH

National Frameworks

Germany, Austria, and Switzerland each apply their own unfair-competition frameworks alongside EU-level developments. Enforcement routes and local case law differ by market.

EU Empowering Consumers Directive (EU 2024/825)

Generic claims (eco-friendly, green, climate-friendly) are restricted unless supported by recognised excellent environmental performance relevant to the claim

Claims that a product has a neutral, reduced, or positive greenhouse-gas impact cannot rely on offsetting outside the product's value chain

Future environmental performance claims need a public implementation plan, measurable targets, and regular independent verification

14 claims affected · 3 new high-risk

CMA Green Claims Code

Claims must be truthful and accurate, clear and unambiguous, and must not omit or hide material information

Comparisons must be fair and meaningful, and claims should consider the full life cycle of the product

CMA investigations have targeted sectors including fashion and FMCG

8 claims affected

FTC Green Guides + State-Level Enforcement

Under FTC review since 2022; the Commission has sought comment on issues including carbon offsets, recyclability, and recycled-content claims

California combines general environmental-marketing rules with tighter recyclability standards under SB 343

State attorneys general can pursue greenwashing cases under general consumer-protection law, as shown by New York's net-zero action against JBS

8 states actively tracked

German UWG, Austrian UWG, Swiss LCD

Germany and Austria must implement ECGT through national law, so practical enforcement remains jurisdiction-specific

German courts and claimants, including Deutsche Umwelthilfe, remain active on greenwashing disputes

Switzerland assesses environmental marketing separately under its own unfair competition law

ECGT application date: 27 September 2026

State-Level Coverage

US state-level enforcement

While the FTC Green Guides provide federal-level guidance, enforcement of environmental marketing claims in the United States is increasingly driven at the state level. Several states have enacted or proposed legislation that creates requirements beyond the federal baseline.

California already prohibits deceptive environmental marketing claims and now applies stricter recyclability standards under SB 343, which limits when marketers can use the chasing-arrows symbol or describe products as recyclable.

New York has shown a willingness to challenge unsupported net-zero marketing through general consumer-protection law, including the Attorney General's action against JBS.

The result is a fragmented landscape: FTC guidance, state-specific statutes, and state attorney general actions can all affect how the same claim is assessed.

Verdanox tracks state-level enforcement activity alongside federal guidance, surfacing risk signals where state requirements exceed the FTC baseline.

CaliforniaNew YorkMassachusettsConnecticutMinnesotaWashingtonOregonVermont
Risk Signals

Grounded in enforcement outcomes, not guesswork

Every risk output is tied to current rules, claim context, and real enforcement actions. Penalty exposure shows ranges drawn from verified precedent rather than black-box scoring language.

Source discipline

Every regulatory reference is checked against primary sources. Penalty exposure is grounded in real enforcement actions.

Sample Risk OutputMedium Risk

“Carbon neutral shipping across EU operations”

JurisdictionsEU (ECGT), UK (CMA)
Key riskOffset-based neutrality and unqualified wording face EU and UK scrutiny
ExposureVaries by jurisdiction, remedy, and enforcement route
Evidence gaps2 certificates expiring within 90 days

See your claims scored with real enforcement data

Review your claims landscape with the Verdanox team in a live session, or explore the governance guide first.

Book a Demo