For sustainability & esg
Make your evidence
work harder.
Keep source documents connected to the statements that depend on them. Make the scope, limitations and review dates understandable to everyone involved.
Recycled-content declaration
- Source scope
- Packaging body
- Review date
- 08 Oct 2026 · Example
- Connected claims
- 2 illustrative records
Your work, in context
Make the source
understandable to everyone.
- 01
Explain what the evidence establishes.
Record the product, component, period and method covered by each source. Give colleagues a useful explanation of the document instead of relying on its filename to carry the meaning.
- 02
See where a source is being used.
One declaration can support more than one statement. Keep those relationships visible so a reviewer can understand the reach of a change without reconstructing it from email.
- 03
Separate commitments from results.
A future target and an achieved outcome are different statements. Keep the timeframe, baseline and supporting progress information visible when a commitment becomes marketing language.
An example you can explore
Follow a source.
See what depends on it.
A change to the source is a question for every connected claim.
Select a declaration, specification or artwork record. Simulate a replacement to see which connected example statements need attention.
Explore an illustrative review. Your team makes the publication decision.
Illustrative evidence dependencies
A source with its scope in view.
- Source scope
- 30% recycled polypropylene by mass in the packaging body. Closure and label are excluded.
- Recorded
- 08 Jul 2026
- Review date
- 08 Oct 2026 · Illustrative review date
- Connected claims
- CLM-0042 · CLM-0043
Made with 30% recycled polypropylene.
Source linked · Review pendingThe packaging body contains recycled polypropylene.
Source linked · Review pendingThe handover
Your contribution.
A shared basis for the next step.
Exact wording, product, channel and intended markets. Colleagues receive the statement as it will appear.
Source version, scope and limitations. Colleagues receive a clear explanation of what the evidence establishes.
Review questions, reasoning and publication conditions. Colleagues receive a decision tied to the reviewed version.
Questions from your team
Clear responsibilities.
Before publication.
Does linking a document mean the claim is substantiated?
The source still needs to support the statement being made. Its component, timeframe and limitations matter as much as its presence in the record.
Can one source support several claims?
It can be relevant to several records. Each connection should explain the particular part of the claim it supports.
What if a certificate or report changes?
Review the connected claims against the new document and its scope. The example shows how that dependency can be made visible to the team.
Put your next claim on record
Bring a source. Follow the claims behind it.
Bring a public or representative example. We’ll explore the wording, evidence and review responsibilities with your team.
Book your walkthroughYour claims. Your markets. A focused conversation.