For legal & compliance
A clear basis
for every decision.
See the statement, the supporting evidence and the intended markets together. Record the questions, conditions and reasoning that shape your team's decision.
Made with 30% recycled polypropylene.
- Record
- CLM-0042 · EU / UK
- Evidence
- 3 source records
- Reviewer note
- Specify the packaging body.
Your work, in context
A review starts with
the complete statement.
- 01
Review the statement people will see.
A product name or campaign theme is not enough context for a publication decision. Keep the exact wording, component, channel and intended markets beside the request for review.
- 02
Follow the source behind the assertion.
A document can be relevant without supporting the whole statement. Open the source record, inspect its scope and keep unanswered questions visible while the wording is revised.
- 03
Keep the reasoning with the version.
Make it possible to understand which wording was reviewed, who contributed and what conditions accompanied the decision. A later edit should not inherit an earlier approval without review.
An example you can explore
Wording. Evidence.
A reasoned decision.
Resolve the boundary before recording a decision.
Move between wording, evidence and decision. Apply the packaging-body clarification, then add the reasoning you want to retain beside version 02.
Explore an illustrative review. Your team makes the publication decision.
CLM-0042 · Illustrative legal review
Made with 30% recycled polypropylene.
Scope clarification · Version 01Made with 30% recycled polypropylene.
The packaging body is made with 30% recycled polypropylene.
The handover
Your contribution.
A shared basis for the next step.
Exact wording, product, channel and intended markets. Colleagues receive the statement as it will appear.
Source version, scope and limitations. Colleagues receive a clear explanation of what the evidence establishes.
Review questions, reasoning and publication conditions. Colleagues receive a decision tied to the reviewed version.
Questions from your team
Clear responsibilities.
Before publication.
Does Verdanox make the legal decision?
No. It brings the relevant record together so your reviewers can assess the claim. Responsibility for publication remains with your organisation.
Can a claim be reviewed differently by market?
Keep the intended markets and any market-specific conditions visible in the review record. The walkthrough can explore how your own review responsibilities should be organised.
What happens if the wording changes after review?
The new wording needs to remain distinguishable from the version that was reviewed. The example shows why a changed statement cannot simply carry over an earlier approval.
Put your next claim on record
Bring a claim that needs a clearer decision.
Bring a public or representative example. We’ll explore the wording, evidence and review responsibilities with your team.
Book your walkthroughYour claims. Your markets. A focused conversation.